Understanding Scores
7-Factor Scoring System
Ideavo evaluates your idea across seven key factors with specific weightings:
Scoring Factors
Problem Analysis (20%)
- Problem severity and impact scope
- Problem frequency (daily/weekly/monthly)
- Solution gaps and user frustration
- Pain point intensity and urgency
Solution Analysis (20%)
- How well solution addresses core problem
- Solution completeness vs partial fixes
- User adoption likelihood
- Implementation ease
Market Need (20%)
- Current market size in USD
- Growth rate percentage (YoY)
- Demand trends and audience size
- Willingness to pay analysis
Differentiation (25%)
- Uniqueness vs competitors
- Competitive advantages and moats
- Barriers to entry
- IP/novel technology indicators
Revenue Model (10%)
- Pricing strategy assessment
- LTV/CAC estimates
- Business model benchmarks
Technical Feasibility (5%)
- Implementation complexity
- Timeline and cost estimates
- Scalability on cloud infrastructure
- Technology dependencies
Scalability (10%)
- Growth potential
- Internationalization capacity
- Network effects potential
- Team/infrastructure requirements
Score Interpretation
Score Ranges
- 8-10 (Green): Excellent potential
- 6-7 (Yellow): Good potential with considerations
- 0-5 (Red): Significant challenges
Overall Score
- Weighted average of all 7 factors
- Confidence level: High/Medium/Low
- Benchmark comparison: Above Average/On Par/Below Average
Validation Results
Score Breakdown
Each factor includes:
- Score: 0-10 rating
- Confidence: High/Medium/Low
- Data Points: Supporting facts and statistics
- Assumptions: Clearly stated logical assumptions
- References: External sources for verification
Additional Analysis
- Challenges & Risks: Categorized by severity
- Competition: Direct/Indirect competitors
- Core Features: Essential features for success
Using Your Scores
High Scores (8-10)
- Strong validation for proceeding
- Consider moving to Build Mode
- Focus on identified core features
Medium Scores (6-7)
- Moderate potential with improvements needed
- Review specific factor recommendations
- Consider pivoting based on insights
Low Scores (0-5)
- Significant challenges identified
- Review fundamental assumptions
- Consider major pivots or alternative approaches